corresponding to the minimum ASTM recommended rate. . The first-crack strength was computed from ASTM C as follows,. (1) where. This standard is issued under the fixed designation C ; the number ASTM Standards: supports, in contact with the specimen, shall be sufficiently. This standard is issued under the ﬁxed designation C ; the number Referenced Documents ASTM Standards: C Practice for Flexural and.
|Published (Last):||14 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||15.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.82 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In order to assess the effectiveness of the polymers, it was necessary to first build, test and calibrate an in-house test machine, cast and test many, many samples, analyze the collected data, and finally, interpret those data in order to draw meaningful and helpful conclusions relevant to the concrete countertop industry.
ASTM C947 Flexural Bend Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Test Equipment
This detailed article explains the context, test procedure, test results, cost analysis and recommendations. This testing procedure is designed to measure and calculate three characteristic properties of the GFRC:. The ASTM C test requires the use of a deflection measuring device and a chart recorder to produce a force-deflection chart.
However, neither the deflection recording device nor the chart recorder is needed to measure or calculate the Flexural Ultimate Strengthwhich is the absolute strength of the material before it fails. While choosing only to measure the Flexural Ultimate Strength of GFRC does provide a limited view of the full properties of GFRC, it indicates the absolute strength of the material, something every concrete countertop maker wants to know.
Additionally, measuring only the Flexural Ultimate Strength simplified the construction of the machine, as Modulus of Elasticity measurements require a much more expensive machine.
Understanding GFRC Tests – Concrete Countertop Institute
Modulus of Elasticity is a property well known to engineers and is crucial in structural calculations.
As stated in our report, multiple identical samples were tested at Applied Materials and Engineering in Oakland California, the same facility that has conducted manufacturer-sponsored testing for at least one of the dry polymers we tested. One bucket of each mix made two sets of samples:. All of the samples were tested on the same day: The machine itself was also valid for the purpose of testing Flexural Ultimate Strength.
Astk allowed CCI to rapidly and inexpensively test a broad range of mix designs and ingredients with the full confidence that the results are real, valid and comparable to those obtained from an independent testing laboratory using far more expensive machinery.
When designing a testing program, first one must determine what exactly is being tested, and eliminate other variables atsm could confound the test results. A Control Sample or Control Group must be designed to eliminate these other, non-relevant variables.
In this case, the variable being tested was the polymer. The goal of the test was to determine whether dry polymers achieve similar flexural strengths as wet polymers in GFRC. It is well known from decades of astn that the addition of wet polymers to GFRC function to eliminate the need for a 7-day wet cure.
This is a variable that must be eliminated in any test that is trying to measure other factors such as the effectiveness of wet polymer. If the tests to determine whether wet polymers work had used a Control Sample with a 0.
That Control Sample does not eliminate all other variables besides the polymer. ANY concrete made with a 0. This testing procedure is ast to measure and calculate three characteristic properties of the GFRC: The Flexural Yield Strength also called limit of proportionality.
Yield measures the first cracking of the cement paste.